Healthcare Tax Unconstitutional

Now that we have the Justice Department's admission that the Healthcare purchase requirement is a tax, or incidental to a tax by operational treatment of it, I found it necessary to restate a Constitutional issue that was also true of the bank bailout bill regarding taxes and revenue.

I brought this up about the Bank Bailout before there was a Tea Party,‭ ‬http://changingwind.org/index/comment.php?comment.news.2.

The unconstitutionality relies on a simple clause of the Constitution,‭ ‬Article I,‭ ‬Section‭ ‬7,‭ ‬Clause‭ ‬1:

‭“‬All Bills for Raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives‭; ‬but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other bills.‭”

At least with the bailout bill the Senate used an interpretation of‭ ‬...‭ “‬but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other bills‭” ‬to justify their taking the Bank Bailout Bill and making it the Dodd Amendment to‭ a ‬bill that had‭ ‬already passed the House.

With Healthcare,‭ ‬there is absolutely no mistake.

There was no‭ “‬origination in the House,‭” ‬which would be required if the Healthcare Purchase requirement is considered‭ “‬raising revenue‭” ‬as the Justice Department appears to be arguing.‭ ‬The House passed a bill,‭ ‬and then the Senate‭ ‬passed a bill,‭ ‬after which they were blended together so as not to lose‭ ‬any of the previous‭ “‬yea‭” ‬votes‭ ‬in either body,‭ ‬and‭ ‬then the blended bill,‭ ‬which ended up being almost entirely the Senate version of the bill,‭ ‬was‭ ‬passed by the House,‭ ‬and put before the Senate for a procedural appearance.

You see,‭ ‬this Clause of the Constitution forbids the Senate from being the source for any and all laws to generate revenue for the United States Government.

Title‭ ‬26‭ ‬changes made to the Bailout bill by the Senate are what triggered my looking into this particular clause.‭ ‬And I should note that in my review of the House passed healthcare bill,‭ ‬HR‭ ‬3200,‭ ‬there appears to have been no requirement of purchase,‭ ‬and no IRS enforcement,‭ ‬that‭ ‬these ideas were devised entirely in the Senate.

It appears President Obama,‭ ‬our Commander-in-Thief,‭ ‬was well aware of this Constitutional provision when arguing the dictionary definition of a tax,‭ ‬or,‭ ‬he just wanted to see how far he could mock our intelligence,‭ ‬after all he is a Progressive Elite,‭ ‬hand-picked for President by the Progressive cartel/cabal of George Soros,‭ ‬Warren Buffett,‭ ‬Oprah Winfrey,‭ ‬Bill Gates,‭ ‬and a host of millionaires and billionaires,‭ ‬banks,‭ ‬and institutional union wealth.

Of course these people,‭ ‬who can afford any doctor day or night,‭ ‬and at any time,‭ ‬could‭ ‬care less about the rest of us being taxed.

It’s just a good thing almost every American makes over‭ ‬$250,000‭ ‬a year,‭ ‬or Obama’s Healthcare Law could be breaking his campaign pledge,‭ ‬and we all know he would never do anything like that.


Thank you for reading,


Toddy Littman


P.S.‭ ‬Please if your state is one of the states suing the federal government in regard to the Healthcare bill get this to your Attorney General’s office,‭ ‬as it seems this little rule in the Constitution has been overlooked for far too long.





printer friendly create pdf of this news item