News Item: Vote Nov 2nd 202-Unalienable Right To Life
(Category: Health Care Reform)
Posted by Toddy Littman
Saturday 30 October 2010 - 21:46:07
Recently Glenn Beck mentioned that the scientists claim to have found “the liberal gene.” He wasn't joking. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/weird/Scientists-May-Have-IDd-Liberal-Gene-105917218.html and http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101027161452.htm
This prompts a need to ask the question why there was a study to find a gene responsible for ideology. What in Heaven's Name is there of any necessity for anyone to know of a gene responsible for ideology? Can you see the threat to mankind by this?
Imagine millions of people injected, infected, and altered by having this gene introduced into their system through food, through water, and most importantly, through a visit to the doctor's office!
Conspiracy “Theory,” really? I mean, it's entirely implausible in light of World War II and the leader of the National Socialist Party (NAZI) party, Adolf Hitler, wasn't attempting genetics in trying to build a “master race” either, right?
Hitler was swept into power on a variety of promises. He sold the people on his ideas through economic policies that spread the wealth around, and, eventually, cultivated tolerance of his desire to build a master race, one bred by bringing blond-haired, blue-eyed people together. The test tube baby was a long way away, the genome certainly not known, but the idea of a recessive gene and the ability to better assure the outcome of the child was possible. Crude genetics yes, but available.
Now keep this in mind with the Jews and the homosexuals who were forced publicly to wear symbols stitched to their clothing announcing and identifying their heritage and sexual preference. Also note these two groups were targeted and killed by the Nazi party as a blight upon the earth, the same party that had courted the German people with promises of “change” to gain power in the first place.
We fought World War II to scourge the beasts who could, and did, inflict inhuman, ungodly medical experiments, torture, and ultimate death upon our fellows; to deny the possibility of these horrors happening again.
Today we have mapping of the genome occurring at a fevered pace, and still we think it wise to hand health care to the government? And this is while we do know the government has carried out experiments on us in the past, particularly with nuclear power plant radiation release, the syphilis project on black men in the South and, in San Francisco on the homosexual population.
Do we decide to question this when the government-run, funded, or otherwise organized, health care system's bureaucrat decides to rebut our rationing claims by explaining that “if you had received the government provided gene therapy you wouldn't have this disease” at some future date? Or is it when someone hires a capable attorney and sues after their spouse dies, getting the bureaucrat on the stand to admit, “Well, statistics showed poor response to other therapies and after reading an article in TIME magazine about genome advances, I took it upon myself to insist that the doctor have all their patients with that medical condition try this therapy or the doctor's payment would be held up indefinitely.” Pardon me. You can’t sue the government. It’s in the bill.
No one has guaranteed this will not, cannot occur, or is an absolute impossibility according to any health care bill put forth. For a President who keeps invoking the 21st Century as a blazing horizon of hope (oh, let’s not forget “change”), he and his comrades in the other branches of government appear incapable of thinking this far ahead. Or have they?
But there is more, and this will sound like science fiction, but it is real and coming to a brain near you: nanobot technology.
Imagine for a moment appreciating some little thing, be it from a friend or loved one, maybe a fond memory that brings a tear to your eye.
Now, imagine not feeling anything from it. So now let’s say it’s something big, say a child getting married or the birth of a grandchild. Just imagine feeling nothing from it, or even anger toward something about it.
Imagine a variety of memories you once had, gone, just vanished because they do not make you more intelligent. But you don’t care since you no longer even remember them, the neurons that made them exist are no longer present in your mind.
These can easily be the results of nanobot technology that the 18 intellectuals who can have the most influence on policies worldwide have suggested “to make people think more intelligently.” Anyone who knows someone with Alzheimer’s knows how heart-wrenching this is to consider.
And, apparently, according to a group of experts, intelligence is a static set of values, ideas, knowledge, etc., there is no variance, no other activity but that which is identified by these people, or others like them, that is intelligence. “One size fits all” is apparently how intelligence is determined and the idea of sanctity of one’s own thoughts to themselves is no longer valid.
Here are links to articles about nanobots as a real, tangible, design to be in our midst in less than 20 years. And you wonder why government wants to run healthcare.
http://www.nanobot.info/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-2Xw-GNkUQ
http://www.scienceahead.com/entry/artificially-intelligent-nanobots-in-human-brains-by-2029/
Gene therapies are good, but programmed bots that replace the neurons in your mind, now that puts an end to a variety of troubles for government and the minions of bureaucrats who want the public to “just comply,” to “just obey.” Imagine being hacked through wi-fi or voting for someone on the basis of what the program in a group of nanobot neurons tells you is right, and not due to your mind’s own knowledge, life, and experience. This is what is in store for us all, and a damn good reason so many in government voted for healthcare this time around, the price they pay for their vote will be temporary. Hell, there are people in Prince Edward Island who are sure there are nanobots in the H1N1 shots (Comments under article at http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/index.cfm?sid=303591&sc=98)
So while we are sold the idea on the basis of the cost to us of the uninsured, let’s not kid ourselves into believing government isn’t doing what is in government’s best interest. If socialism, spawned, bred and brought to thrive the regime of Hitler, and we're in the midst of a Progressive ideologue who passes bills over our objection and hires 8,000 people who are immediately put into a military medical unit, there is absolutely nothing to say the Progressives, as a collective, aren't absolutely moving in this direction. Their honest belief is that with this nanobot technology you will “think more intelligently.” Once there is this government healthcare in place, irrespective of 60% of Americans not wanting this bill, it’s very obvious this law was illegally passed for purposes the government has in mind, nothing else, and we have history, the writing on the wall, to show this can happen, a history that we appear to be ignoring. Maybe Obama’s mention of “doing things no one knows about,” on Jon Stewart’s show, comes under this category.
I just hope enough read this to understand our entire race of people and the sentience we've enjoyed for 500 years, is at stake here. Makes me wonder if we fought Hitler merely because those who wanted this here didn't want him to have it first. May sound crazy but every single Man, Woman, and Child on this planet should be fighting their governments until this activity is brought to an end. Individuality, “viva la difference,” is the basis of our evolution under God.
Thank you for reading,
Toddy Littman
This news item is from ChangingWind.Org
( http://changingwind.org/rename/news.php?extend.117 )
(Category: Health Care Reform)
Posted by Toddy Littman
Saturday 30 October 2010 - 21:46:07
Your Vote For Conservatives Nov 2nd Protects The Individual “Unalienable Right To Life”
Recently Glenn Beck mentioned that the scientists claim to have found “the liberal gene.” He wasn't joking. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/weird/Scientists-May-Have-IDd-Liberal-Gene-105917218.html and http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101027161452.htm
This prompts a need to ask the question why there was a study to find a gene responsible for ideology. What in Heaven's Name is there of any necessity for anyone to know of a gene responsible for ideology? Can you see the threat to mankind by this?
Imagine millions of people injected, infected, and altered by having this gene introduced into their system through food, through water, and most importantly, through a visit to the doctor's office!
Conspiracy “Theory,” really? I mean, it's entirely implausible in light of World War II and the leader of the National Socialist Party (NAZI) party, Adolf Hitler, wasn't attempting genetics in trying to build a “master race” either, right?
Hitler was swept into power on a variety of promises. He sold the people on his ideas through economic policies that spread the wealth around, and, eventually, cultivated tolerance of his desire to build a master race, one bred by bringing blond-haired, blue-eyed people together. The test tube baby was a long way away, the genome certainly not known, but the idea of a recessive gene and the ability to better assure the outcome of the child was possible. Crude genetics yes, but available.
Now keep this in mind with the Jews and the homosexuals who were forced publicly to wear symbols stitched to their clothing announcing and identifying their heritage and sexual preference. Also note these two groups were targeted and killed by the Nazi party as a blight upon the earth, the same party that had courted the German people with promises of “change” to gain power in the first place.
We fought World War II to scourge the beasts who could, and did, inflict inhuman, ungodly medical experiments, torture, and ultimate death upon our fellows; to deny the possibility of these horrors happening again.
Today we have mapping of the genome occurring at a fevered pace, and still we think it wise to hand health care to the government? And this is while we do know the government has carried out experiments on us in the past, particularly with nuclear power plant radiation release, the syphilis project on black men in the South and, in San Francisco on the homosexual population.
Do we decide to question this when the government-run, funded, or otherwise organized, health care system's bureaucrat decides to rebut our rationing claims by explaining that “if you had received the government provided gene therapy you wouldn't have this disease” at some future date? Or is it when someone hires a capable attorney and sues after their spouse dies, getting the bureaucrat on the stand to admit, “Well, statistics showed poor response to other therapies and after reading an article in TIME magazine about genome advances, I took it upon myself to insist that the doctor have all their patients with that medical condition try this therapy or the doctor's payment would be held up indefinitely.” Pardon me. You can’t sue the government. It’s in the bill.
No one has guaranteed this will not, cannot occur, or is an absolute impossibility according to any health care bill put forth. For a President who keeps invoking the 21st Century as a blazing horizon of hope (oh, let’s not forget “change”), he and his comrades in the other branches of government appear incapable of thinking this far ahead. Or have they?
But there is more, and this will sound like science fiction, but it is real and coming to a brain near you: nanobot technology.
Imagine for a moment appreciating some little thing, be it from a friend or loved one, maybe a fond memory that brings a tear to your eye.
Now, imagine not feeling anything from it. So now let’s say it’s something big, say a child getting married or the birth of a grandchild. Just imagine feeling nothing from it, or even anger toward something about it.
Imagine a variety of memories you once had, gone, just vanished because they do not make you more intelligent. But you don’t care since you no longer even remember them, the neurons that made them exist are no longer present in your mind.
These can easily be the results of nanobot technology that the 18 intellectuals who can have the most influence on policies worldwide have suggested “to make people think more intelligently.” Anyone who knows someone with Alzheimer’s knows how heart-wrenching this is to consider.
And, apparently, according to a group of experts, intelligence is a static set of values, ideas, knowledge, etc., there is no variance, no other activity but that which is identified by these people, or others like them, that is intelligence. “One size fits all” is apparently how intelligence is determined and the idea of sanctity of one’s own thoughts to themselves is no longer valid.
Here are links to articles about nanobots as a real, tangible, design to be in our midst in less than 20 years. And you wonder why government wants to run healthcare.
http://www.nanobot.info/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-2Xw-GNkUQ
http://www.scienceahead.com/entry/artificially-intelligent-nanobots-in-human-brains-by-2029/
Gene therapies are good, but programmed bots that replace the neurons in your mind, now that puts an end to a variety of troubles for government and the minions of bureaucrats who want the public to “just comply,” to “just obey.” Imagine being hacked through wi-fi or voting for someone on the basis of what the program in a group of nanobot neurons tells you is right, and not due to your mind’s own knowledge, life, and experience. This is what is in store for us all, and a damn good reason so many in government voted for healthcare this time around, the price they pay for their vote will be temporary. Hell, there are people in Prince Edward Island who are sure there are nanobots in the H1N1 shots (Comments under article at http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/index.cfm?sid=303591&sc=98)
So while we are sold the idea on the basis of the cost to us of the uninsured, let’s not kid ourselves into believing government isn’t doing what is in government’s best interest. If socialism, spawned, bred and brought to thrive the regime of Hitler, and we're in the midst of a Progressive ideologue who passes bills over our objection and hires 8,000 people who are immediately put into a military medical unit, there is absolutely nothing to say the Progressives, as a collective, aren't absolutely moving in this direction. Their honest belief is that with this nanobot technology you will “think more intelligently.” Once there is this government healthcare in place, irrespective of 60% of Americans not wanting this bill, it’s very obvious this law was illegally passed for purposes the government has in mind, nothing else, and we have history, the writing on the wall, to show this can happen, a history that we appear to be ignoring. Maybe Obama’s mention of “doing things no one knows about,” on Jon Stewart’s show, comes under this category.
I just hope enough read this to understand our entire race of people and the sentience we've enjoyed for 500 years, is at stake here. Makes me wonder if we fought Hitler merely because those who wanted this here didn't want him to have it first. May sound crazy but every single Man, Woman, and Child on this planet should be fighting their governments until this activity is brought to an end. Individuality, “viva la difference,” is the basis of our evolution under God.
Thank you for reading,
Toddy Littman
This news item is from ChangingWind.Org
( http://changingwind.org/rename/news.php?extend.117 )